Call for votes: Server Technical Specification

[Máirín Duffy]

Hi,


On 02/28/2014 01:55 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> If you have serious concerns, please raise them immediately.

I'll +1 but my concerns are as follows:

- The Accessibility section makes no statements about Cockpit's a11y or 
required state of a11y; is the web ui designed in such a way to be 
usable by those using screen readers? I've not used it but with the 
general popularity if JS frameworks that aren't necessarily 
screen-reader friendly it is a concern.

- Encryption - I think this was raised elsewhere in the thread but we 
should probably have a section to talk about encryption support (altho 
we missed this in PRD :-/) This would affect the filesystem and install 
defaults specifications.

- Appearance - ok maybe this is stupid but it would be nice to have 
installed and configured by default a nice console font like inconsolata 
or something like that with reasonable fallbacks for i18n.

- Backup - we talk about roles req lists of things to back up - do we 
have a blessed backup system(s) we support tying into?

~m