Call for votes: Server Technical Specification
Miloslav Trmač
mitr at volny.cz
Mon Mar 3 15:09:06 UTC 2014
2014-02-28 19:55 GMT+01:00 Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh at redhat.com>:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Server/Technical_Specification
>
<snip>
> What we need right now is a vote of the Server Working Group
> membership whether we feel this document is in sufficiently good shape
> to send to FESCo, who intends to use it to gauge estimates for the
> Fedora 21 schedule.
>
+1.
Non-blocking comments regarding the role definition:
- "A mechanism to install optional components of a role after
deployment." Do we really need this? Could we do without this complexity?
- The firewall configuration: the mechanism to open/close ports
shouldn't be a role-specific API; couldn't the role just provide a
firewalld service definition, and leave the enabling/disabling to the
standard firewalld mechanisms?
Mirek
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/server/attachments/20140303/8fbea50e/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the server
mailing list