Beta blocker/FE update karma requests

Stephen Gallagher sgallagh at redhat.com
Wed Apr 15 00:37:00 UTC 2015


On Tue, 2015-04-14 at 14:40 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hi folks! As some of you know, part of the release validation 
> process is
> to make sure the fixes for blocker and freeze exception bugs are 
> tested
> and confirmed, and give karma to the updates so they can be pushed to
> stable.
> 
> For F22 Beta, the following updates for blocker/FE bugs have been
> included in Beta RC2, and we need to confirm the fixes and provide
> karma. It would be great if folks could help with this. Of course not
> everyone will have the necessary configuration or Cloud accounts or
> whatever to test every fix, don't worry! Just do whatever you can if 
> you
> have some time to help out.
> 


...

> * 
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-5960/realmd-0.15.2-2.fc22
> 
> This one fixes  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210483.
> Testing the blocker fix requires you to have an Active Directory 
> domain
> controller available (you'd have to install Fedora 22 Beta RC2 Server
> and then enrol the newly installed system in the AD domain using 
> realmd
> - test cases at
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_22_Beta_RC2_Server#Domain_joining_tests:_Active_Directory 
> - but if you have a FreeIPA domain you could at least check this 
> realmd build works OK for enrolling in that domain.
> 

I've been testing this one fairly thoroughly for the last couple days 
(since I've also been working on a (non-security) bug in the SSSD AD 
provider). I'm confident this is working now. It was really a matter 
of a file that realmd needed getting moved to another subpackage 
package of samba, so I fixed the dependency.

I submitted this one for stable this morning on my own judgement (and 
because upstream released a new version to updates-testing and we want 
to make sure the RC2 tree doesn't end up with a different version than 
the stable tree).


> * 
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4922/rolekit-0.3.2-1.fc22
> 
> This fixes  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209602and 
> also
>  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207872(an FE bug), both
> related to deployment of the database 'Server Role'. To test it, 
> install
> Fedora 22 Beta RC2 Server (DVD, or if you use the netinst, ensure you
> get that version of rolekit from updates-testing) and then try to 
> deploy
> the database server role...which I can't find any instructions for 
> ATM,
> but sgallagh might be able to provide some. Then check you can log 
> into
> the deployed pgsql instance with the password from the role config.
> 

== Database Server Role ==
* Install the first instance from a mostly pristine Server install.
* Install additional instance
* Install some instances with the default owner, others with a custom 
one.
* Decommission them in random order.
* Ensure that they can be reached over TCP/IP sockets

Just to clarify, you can create DB Role instances as follows:

 * Create a file something.json with the following contents:

{
    "database": "a_database_name",
    "owner": "an_optional_name",
    "password": "an_optional_owner_password"
}


Then install with:
$ rolectl deploy --settings-file=something.json databaseserver"

See rolekit.roles.databaseserver(5) for all possible options for the 
JSON file and how they work.



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/server/attachments/20150414/0f330e29/attachment.sig>


More information about the server mailing list