Change Proposal to drop i686 in Fedora 24

[Stephen Gallagher]

On Wed, 2015-08-19 at 18:49 +0300, Joonas Sarajärvi wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> 2015-08-19 18:42 GMT+03:00 Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh at redhat.com>:
> > On Wed, 2015-08-19 at 16:40 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > > I'm presuming that is just for the Server Edition, just to
> > > clarify it
> > > as it's not clear in the subject
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > Yes, this proposal is just for the Server Edition. The Change
> > Proposal
> > page should state that clearly, sorry for leaving it out of the
> > subject.
> 
> My impression is that all the non-live installation media are
> currently somewhat under the Server flavour, even if they seem
> capable
> of doing non-Server installations.
> 
> Would this change leave i686 with only the kind of install media that
> installs a desktop environment?
> 
> I think most of my server-ish Fedora installations are "nonproduct"
> ones, so it would not affect me much if the stuff specific to Server
> flavour is not available on i686. But I'd really want to have some
> means of making a minimal nonproduct i686 installation.
> 


Please take that to FESCo. This discussion is solely about the Fedora
Server Edition deliverables.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/server/attachments/20150819/7013782b/attachment.sig>