RFC Fedora 23 Change idea

Jaroslav Reznik jreznik at redhat.com
Tue May 26 09:11:31 UTC 2015


----- Original Message -----
> On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 06:44:49PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > I know it is a pretty rough outline but figured I would get something
> > out and some discussion to see if what others thought. I think
> > especially the atomic version could be really useful. a very simple
> > way to get some storage up and running and use and keep it updated.
> > especially long term, since going from Fedora 23 to 24 should be a
> > simple atomic update.
> 
> I like the idea, and I think it would make a lot of sense for a Fedora
> Server role.
>
> I think it'd be nice to have a relatively simple interface where one
> sees storage as a pool of (redundant) disks, probably grouped into /srv
> or whatever, and then a separate interface for exporting directories
> from that volume via cifs, nfs, or others (but I think cifs and nfs as
> top priority).
> 
> I like the idea in general for using atomic/ostree here, but I wonder
> if maybe this would be best in the general context of making _all_ of
> the server roles available that way.

For embedded devices like NAS I think Atomic based image is much more
suitable than traditional Server installation. And just a pure image,
roles sounds like container but why not to have same roles on top of
both NAS and server? Maybe one day...

Jaroslav

> --
> Matthew Miller
> <mattdm at fedoraproject.org>
> Fedora Project Leader
> _______________________________________________
> server mailing list
> server at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/server


More information about the server mailing list