[Fedora-sparc] status update
Dennis Gilmore
dennis at ausil.us
Thu Sep 16 21:52:17 UTC 2010
On Thursday, September 16, 2010 03:56:37 pm Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Friday, September 10, 2010 02:28:54 pm Lamar Owen wrote:
> > On Thursday, September 02, 2010 12:24:49 pm Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > > you should start to see updates for F-12 soon
> >
> > Many thanks; seeing them.
>
> Ok, getting updates, but many are not working. Is exactarch=1 still normal
> in /etc/yum.conf? Are glibc updates going to continue to need
> exactarch=0? And are the devel packages not rebuilt yet? That is, how
> close are we on the full updates rebuild?
you shouldnt need exactarch=1
there is a bug in yum that we tracked down and is fixed upstream. waiting on
seth to push out an update.
http://yum.baseurl.org/gitweb?p=yum.git;a=commitdiff;h=a487c093c2c7c5e5c594ae866a6c740aabe367df
is the commit that fixes it
I have run though koji-shadow completely a couple of times now somethings were
not attempted to be built due to things they were built against in primary
fedora failing to build. and im slowly working though fedora 14, we do have
gcc, glibc, kernel etc built. as well as python 2.7 and perl 5.12.1 still
alot that needs to be built though.
Dennis
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/sparc/attachments/20100916/1eb889bb/attachment.bin
More information about the sparc
mailing list