[Fedora-spins] Requesting technical approval for Sugar Spin

[Bryan Kearney]

Sebastian Dziallas wrote:
> Sebastian Dziallas wrote:
>> Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>>> Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
>>>> Sebastian Dziallas wrote:
>>>>> I've uploaded a new version here:
>>>>>
>>>>>     http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/kickstart/fedora-livecd-sugar.ks
>>>>>
>>>> Looks pretty reasonable to me, I see no objections in taking this in for 
>>>> F11, could I get another +1 from someone?
>>> Sure but could you add a comment on why you are using slim in the 
>>> kickstart file itself?
>> Sure! ;)
>>
>> Well, we're trying to lower the system requirements for this spin as 
>> much as possible, since we got several requests to make it boot on 
>> machines with 256 RAM.
>>
>> GDM is known to pull in quite some Gnome-related dependencies, which we 
>> don't really need (since I tried to completely exclude Gnome). So we 
>> discussed the use of slim instead of gdm and thanks to Marco's work, 
>> we're for now including slim.
>>
>>> You are using generic-logos but not generic-release.
>> Sorry, I should have changed this, yeah. Done in the new version.
>>
>>> Also, you ks file seems derived from desktop ks so I would like to note 
>>> that some more changes have been made in the original such as dropping 
>>> GNOME games. You might want to look into rebasing it to match as much as 
>>>   applicable.
>>>
>>> Rahul
>> I've now synced it against the latest desktop ks from our 
>> spin-kickstarts pool and uploaded new version at the same place.
>>
>> Thanks for all your feedback!
>>
>> --Sebastian
> 
> Any chance for getting another +1 here so that I can push it to the 
> spin-kickstarts GIT repo?
> 
> Btw: I needed to disable SELinux in the latest version since bug #466884 
> is giving us problems with SELinux and slim. Once this is fixed, it will 
> definitely be enabled again.


I was able to build it fine. I could not get browse or yum to connect to 
the internet. I have an IP.. so it may be issues with my machine. Since 
I dont see this being controlled by the ks I would be +1.

-- bk