[Fedora-spins] Fedora Ro Spin State?

[Adrian]

Hi,

This been said I conclude that the spin can only live in git or l10n, so 
I'll end the pursuit for the full live image. But I'll continue the 
documentation task on how to build a live localized iso. The 
documentation will be available on our community site in an easy to 
read/implement format for which we'll offer support.

Thank you for your time.

Best regards,
Adrian

On 01/27/2010 06:34 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 04:31:04PM +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote:
>    
>> Am Mittwoch, den 27.01.2010, 17:01 +0200 schrieb Adrian:
>>      
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> The thing is that our users would feel in some way special when Fedora
>>> will care sufficiently that it will build a dedicated spin for them.
>>>        
>> Understood. But I think Kevin's question still stands: What is the
>> benefit compared to the other spins and choosing the RO locale there?
>>
>> If there is anything that we can improve, we should improve it in all
>> spins and not just a localized one that will target a limited user base.
>>      
> I think Christoph is correct.  I don't think there's much chance of
> the Fedora Project Board approving a localized spin for the reasons
> you guys have already stated.  The BrOffice.org spin was created to
> allow distribution of Fedora while avoiding a specific trademark
> problem in that region.
>
> Because the Live spins tend to provide all the l10n bits, there's not
> as much value in a spin that just happens to default to some other
> language.  I think it would be more valuable to look at how we might
> better provide, and show the user at boot time how to get, a properly
> localized environment no matter where they live.
>
> One other minor point -- if we're hearing any sort of consistent
> issues with producing a spin from a kickstart, such as being too hard,
> then that process probably needs to be better documented.
>
>    

-- 
:: http://fedoraproject.ro :: http://forum.fedoraproject.ro ::