[Fedora-suds-list] My Slackness

[Chris Wj]

WADL, WSDL 2.0 REST

[1] http://www.w3.org/Submission/wadl/

Async: cool and useful
gzip: def, probably the easiest upgrade

On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 6:00 PM, Daniel Rodriguez <danjrod at gmail.com> wrote:

> Just like Joshua I think that some extra time can be given to get an
> important feature polished.
>
> I am happily working with 0.3.9 and I think so far suds is covering the
> needs of most users (leaving apart those who are looking for things that
> suds can't provide like writing a service, for example)
>
> As I opened a couple of tickets for enhancements (with patches included) I
> would like to know your view on such changes making it to 0.4
>
>    - Asynchrounous usage of suds (312)
>    - Exception improvement by having a general SudsError and deriving all
>    exceptions from there (310). I see someone opened 324 reporting some base
>    "Exceptions" being launched which I can confirm
>    - Transport with gzip support (311 and 318)
>
>
> Best regards
>
> Daniel
>
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 18:15, Joshua J. Kugler <joshua at eeinternet.com>wrote:
>
>> On Friday 18 June 2010, Jeff Ortel elucidated thus:
>> > The 0.4 release is mostly ready to go out but I'm not completely
>> > happy with the 'plugins' API.  I can either release as is with the
>> > caveat that it /may/ change.  Or, I can wait and get it the way I
>> > want it first.
>>
>> Since the plugin feature is going to be a "big deal," I would lean
>> toward getting it right.  You certainly want it to be well thought out,
>> clean, and easy to use.  Releasing a poorly implemented feature gives a
>> project a bad reputation, and maybe worse: give the feature a bad
>> reputation, which means it will be used less or not at all.
>>
>> We'll wait.  I'd rather have a feature that works well than one I have
>> to hack around to get it to do what I want.
>>
>> j
>>
>> --
>> Joshua Kugler
>> Part-Time System Admin/Programmer
>> http://www.eeinternet.com
>> PGP Key: http://pgp.mit.edu/  ID 0x73B13B6A
>> _______________________________________________
>> suds mailing list
>> suds at lists.fedoraproject.org
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/suds
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> suds mailing list
> suds at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/suds
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/suds/attachments/20100623/9c0fcc7d/attachment-0001.html