RawHide and signature

Féliciano Matias feliciano.matias at free.fr
Thu Aug 14 16:29:33 UTC 2003


Le jeu 14/08/2003 à 17:56, William Hooper a écrit :
> Féliciano Matias said:
> > Le mer 13/08/2003 à 15:49, Bill Nottingham a écrit :
> >> Féliciano Matias (feliciano.matias at free.fr) said:
> >> > Many packages in Rawhide are not signed (528/1461).
> >> > Normal ?
> >>
> >> Yes, it's normal. Signing is a manual process, it's not done all
> >> the time.
> >>
> >
> > OK, it's too much work.
> 
> I see that as saying it's a priority thing.  Signing testing packages
> isn't high on the priority list.
> 
> > But what can i do if my favourite rawhide mirror is cracked ?
> > Nothing.
> 
> Don't install Rawhide on an important system.  Heck, I thought the
> definition of Rawhide was not to see if something broke, but into how many
> pieces.

I am talking about piracy, not bugs.

-- 
Féliciano Matias <feliciano.matias at free.fr>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/attachments/20030814/2f6080ad/attachment.bin 


More information about the test mailing list