no ... *really* ... any ETA for updated beta?

[Stephen Smoogen]

Geez. You people are f*ing impossible. [A previous email used a lot more
expletives.. but most of them were anatomically impossible for non
contortionists] 

Lets see.. Red Hat says there are a lot of problems but cant go into
them, they say that they are working on things but cant say when it will
be ready, and they have said it isnt technical problems. A roadmap of
corporate speak says that there have been some legal/contract questions
raised by outside parties that Red Hat has to answer before it can go
ahead. What are those problems.. I dont know... I am willing to give
them the benefit of the doubt that if they could tell us they would.  
If I didnt trust them somewhat, I would walk away versus giving
sarcastic/cynical comments every 4 hours. 

On 27 Aug 2003, Féliciano Matias wrote:

>Le mer 27/08/2003 à 15:23, Jeremy Portzer a écrit :
>> On Wed, 2003-08-27 at 07:47, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>> >   just curious.  even a general hint would be useful.
>> > imminent?  not so imminent?  not even a gleam in someone's
>> > eye?
>> > 
>> 
>> I think we're back to the days of the answer being "when it's ready."
>> 
>
>RHLP inaugurate a new kind of open project :
>- "wait and see"
>
>The RedHat touch :-)
>
>> --Jeremy
>

-- 
Stephen John Smoogen            smoogen at lanl.gov
Los Alamos National Labrador  CCN-5 Sched 5/40  PH: 5-8058
Ta-03 SM-261  MailStop P208 DP 17U  Los Alamos, NM 87545
-- So shines a good deed in a weary world. = Willy Wonka --