no ... *really* ... any ETA for updated beta?

[Féliciano Matias]

Le ven 29/08/2003 à 00:18, Jef Spaleta a écrit :
> Féliciano Matias
> >I don't blame RedHat for not respecting the initial scheduler. I blame
> >RedHat for not fully keeping the promise to open RHLP process.
> [...]
> .whether
> or not people like myself know with great accuracy when  the beta2 iso
> set is coming is still not going to be important.

Beta2 release date is not the point.
What i don't like, is when RedHat says something and doesn't seem to do
it.
This hurt the RedHat brand image.

RedHat claim to open the RHLP process but don't like some questions
about this process. That's the problem.

RedHat update http://rhl.redhat.com/ and everything is nice now.


> 
> 
> -jef"pam_dotfile is actually sort of useful"spaleta
> 
>  
-- 
Féliciano Matias <feliciano.matias at free.fr>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/attachments/20030829/b7cf64e6/attachment.bin