Why xcdroast and not gcombust?
Steve Bergman
steve at rueb.com
Sun Aug 31 20:25:01 UTC 2003
I was just wondering why xcdroast gets included as the standard cd
writer and not gcombust. I always end up frustrated with xcdroast and
gcombust is quite friendly. Also, it's obvious how to write an existing
iso image with gcombust and I don't see that xcdroast can even do it.
Plus gcombust fits in nicely with Bluecurve and is at least a GTK app,
whereas xcdroast is, well, whatever it is. I there a licensing issue or
something?
Then again, eventually, I suppose, nautilus will do it all.
Just curious.
-Steve
More information about the test
mailing list