pmatilai at welho.com
Wed Jul 30 06:30:43 UTC 2003
Quoting Mike Chambers <mike at netlyncs.com>:
> On Tue, 2003-07-29 at 17:10, Chris Hillman wrote:
> > I experienced the same thing and have posted it in bugzilla (101192).
> > If you're going to brag about it so much during the install, then
> > install it :). I also felt that since the upgrade modified
> > /etc/sysconfig/init to say "GRAPHICAL = yes" that rhgb should definitely
> > be installed.
> Remember, upgrading is exactly what it is, upgrading. It doesn't
> (AFAICT) install extra packages, unless one of the upgraded packages has
> a dependency that must be met, therefore installs the package. rhgb
> doesn't exist on 9, so it doesn't get installed. And just because the
> /etc/sysconfig/init got updated, is only because it already existed and
> the new package included the graphical boot code.
OTOH anaconda *does* fiddle around with package selections to some extent on
upgrades: there's code for removing blacklisted stuff (linuxconf, no wonder :),
installing rhn-applet if up2date-gnome was installed, making sure certain GNOME
packages are installed etc. Whether rhgb should be automatically added on
upgrade .. well, I dunno.
- Panu -
More information about the test