RHEL 3.0 or Fedora for a 'production environment' ?

[shrek-m at gmx.de]

Res wrote:

>On Sat, 1 Nov 2003, Jesse Keating wrote:
>  
>
>>Support is one thing.  You could always count on your internal guys for
>>support.  But what about software backports?  Were your internal guys
>>rolling their own updates and pushing them out to your production servers?
>>Think about it....   
>>
>
>[...] I cant, some of our servers are still running 7.3, cause we knew RH will
>put out errata if its seriou enough, general updates who cares, get the
>tarball, looks like thats how we'll be updateing untill we decide which
>way to go, update by tarballs in future, or move onto slackware or suse.
>

lol SuSE,
i personally wouldn´t go back to suse.
i had bad experience with the suse-support and i don´t like yast.
but this is my opinion.

http://www.suse.de/us/private/download/updates/index.html

http://redhat.com/apps/support/errata/

-- 
shrek-m