Delay? Looks bad for Fedora

[Alin Osan]

On Tuesday 04 November 2003 15:08, Timothy Murphy wrote:


> That didn't seem to be what the poster was saying.
> He was expressing the view -- which I share --
> was that the development may be bad _for RedHat_.

I see no argument in favor of that. RH will concentrate on the features 
that makes RH Linux a viable solution for enterprises. As an IT manager 
I'd be happy to have a linux kernel that is tested by millions of linux 
users and has comercial support.

> To me, the RH/Fedora thing is just very confusing,
> and I don't want to spend a lot of time thinking (or reading) about it.

Sorry, no one can help you with that...

> I'm actually running Fedora on one desktop, and RH-9.0 on another,
> and both are running perfectly.
> But I knew exactly where I was with RH-6-7-8-9,
> and I don't feel I know exactly where I am with Fedora.

Changes can be disturbing ... but they are the key for progress.

> I just think they may have made a commercial mistake.

I would be happy to hear some arguments.

-- 
--
We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit.
--
Alin Osan || Network Administrator @ "Fundatia Casa"
http://www.casa.org.ro