Questioning RH's decisions to remain a viable and independent company?
Michael Schwendt
ms-nospam-0306 at arcor.de
Wed Nov 5 23:51:22 UTC 2003
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003 15:16:03 -0500 (EST), William Hooper wrote:
>
> jdow said:
>
> > http://www.debian.org/ might be more useful, Mike. I hate to go. But
> > I am bailing out after Red Hat cuts RH 9 support short.
>
> IIRC Red Hat 9 EOL was announced when it was released (or soon after).
> How is it that "Red Hat cuts RH 9 support short"?
The errata support period policy was announced end of 2002, some time
after Red Hat Linux 8.0 and hence long before Red Hat Linux 9.
--
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/attachments/20031106/a22e32b4/attachment.bin
More information about the test
mailing list