getting pine to run under fedora 0.94 -- a couple issues

[Jeremy Portzer]

Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> 
>   when i asked about this on another list, i'm sure i was pointed to a
> filed bugzilla entry on this.  just now, i tried to query for this report,
> but was utterly unable to find it.  i tried to be as general as possible,
> "fedora", "test2", didn't even specify a status or anything. but got no
> hits.
> 
>   can someone provide the magic incantation that would have produced this
> bug report, based on the relevant keywords?  sometimes, bugzilla can be 
> maddeningly non-productive.
> 

I think you're referring to this:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101982

I found it by doing a quick search on "libcom_err.so.3" .  It was filed 
on the "distribution" component which maybe is why you didn't find it. 
I guess this is correct because it can't be a problem with pine, since 
there is no pine in FC test2, but it's also not really a problem with 
kerberos, since nothing else needs this.  Not sure how this can be resolved.

In answer to someone else's question on this thread about where to get 
the SRPM, you can just use the one from Red Hat Linux 9, which is a 
heavily patched version of 4.44.  Be sure to get the one from the 
updates tree.  Also, you don't need to edit the spec manually, you can 
just do this command on the SRPM:
	rpm --rebuild --define "nokerberos 1" pine-4.44-19.90.0.src.rpm

Of course, that disables kerberos which isn't approrpiate for everyone, 
looks like the packages at Fedora.us solve that in a better way.

--Jeremy
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 256 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/attachments/20031007/d4f3dfdb/attachment.bin