XFree86 available via yum
Mike A. Harris
mharris at redhat.com
Wed Oct 15 17:21:08 UTC 2003
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, Thomas Dodd wrote:
>> I truely have no idea what this has to do with me providing
>> XFree86 via FTP and yum via FTP.
>
>I think they want http access to the ftp site. Some one
>mentioned better download speed with http. It's probably a
>configuration/firewall issue on their end though. But they want
>to use an http URL for yum since it's faster for them currently.
Ah. Well, people.redhat.com is a place where employees are able
to put whatever they like in either ftp and/or http. You'd have
to convince all employees individually to reconstruct their
entire web/ftp space to be the same. Good luck. ;o)
The only way it could be universally relied upon would be if it
was enforced administratively that way. I dunno about other
employees, but if our infrastructure was changed in any dramatic
way, I'd just move my ftp/http stuff to a server like
freedesktop.org or www.linux.org.uk ;o)
>I think the p.rh.c sould be setup with files available both
>ways. Some people only have http access (Arjan for one), and I
>prefer FTP (like you). I'll forget who as which setup, FTP to
>p.rh.c and see nothing, only to find out later that it was
>there, but http only.
If it requires zero effort on my end, and no modifications to any
of my bash scripts, I wouldn't mind. If I have to hack/debug
scripts to deal with changes, I'd change them once - to point to
a server under my own control that I know wont change. ;o)
--
Mike A. Harris ftp://people.redhat.com/mharris
OS Systems Engineer - XFree86 maintainer - Red Hat
More information about the test
mailing list