apt vs yum
Noah Silva [Mailing list]
nsilva-list at aoi.atari-source.com
Wed Oct 15 20:01:41 UTC 2003
> > > Is one or the other going to be the "preferred" method besides up2date,
> > > or are both going to continue to be supported in the free area? It
> > > sounds like yum is the preferred method, but still lots of people using
> > > apt, so wasn't sure.
> >
> > I think it is pretty much a matter of which side of the religion you wish
> > to be on. Personally I lean toward yum but that is just me.
Seems like "redhat people" like YUM better, while "Debian people" like APT
better.. then again it was a rh based distro that ported APT.
APT supposedly did some dirty tricks with RPM in the past..
then again YUM seems to me infinitely slower than apt, and I like being
able to use the same tool on my debian and redhat machines.
But I couldn't use APT on rawhide last I checked, so the point is moot.
-- noah silva
More information about the test
mailing list