Performance testing (pass 1)
ByteEnable
ByteEnable at austin.rr.com
Fri Sep 26 15:48:24 UTC 2003
On Fri, 2003-09-26 at 09:10, Stephan Schutter wrote:
> I compared Windows XP and RHL 9 on a Dell Laptop (C610)
>
> CPU: 1000MHZ
> RAM: 256MB
>
> Software:
>
> OS: WinXP RHL 9
> Open office OpenOffice
> MS Office 2k MS Office 2k
>
>
> Software startup times:
> WinXP RHL 9
> (s) (s)
> OS bootup 37 70
> Login 8 21
> Def Browser 1 7
> Word 2k 4 6
> Open Office 10 21
> Def TextEdit 1 3
> File Browser 1.5 1.5
>
> Timings are average of 5 launches. Word on linux, suprisingly, is snappier
> than OpenOffice... Open Office is faster on Windows than linux...
>
> Soooo.... do I need to ask?
>
> 1. If Open Source writes better software; then why is it fatter and
> slower?
>
> 2. Is any one at RHL working on desktop performance?
>
> These are some of the sugestione that I may need to answe to when I
> present this and further data to my managers. Gys... what should I say?
>
> One of the original sugestions of why to use Linux is that it could buy
> you longer life on the old hardware... this does not seem to be the case.
>
I believe that Microsoft preloads some of the office code during
login/startup. This same same complaint, "it takes so long to load
word", was leveled at MS years ago.
Robert Thomas
More information about the test
mailing list