bind*EL* in fedora ?

John Ellson ellson at research.att.com
Tue Aug 24 20:00:30 UTC 2004


Alexandre Oliva wrote:

>On Aug 24, 2004, Satish Balay <balay at fastmail.fm> wrote:
>
>  
>
>>I guess the proper error (from today's rawhide) should have been
>>reported:
>>    
>>
>
>  
>
>>Running test transaction:
>>Errors reported doing trial run
>>file /usr/share/man/man5/resolver.5.gz conflicts between attempted installs of bind-utils-9.2.4-EL4_1 and man-pages-1.67-2
>>    
>>
>
>It's actually a bug in up2date, that I filed earlier today.  If you
>install the packages with rpm (I tried separately, but I suppose it
>would work to install them in a single transaction), no conflict is
>reported.
>
>  
>
Not quite.  I tried a single transaction, but that failed so I did an 
"rpm -e" of the conflicting packages.
The dependency conflict is the same if I try to reinstall them individually:

    root at ontap:RPMS# rpm -Uvh bind-chroot-9.2.4-EL4_1.i386.rpm 
bind-devel-9.2.4-EL4_1.i386.rpm
    error: Failed dependencies:
        bind = 9.2.4 is needed by bind-chroot-9.2.4-EL4_1
        bind = 9.2.4 is needed by bind-devel-9.2.4-EL4_1
    root at ontap:RPMS# rpm -q bind
    bind-9.2.4-EL4_1
    root at ontap:RPMS#



John





More information about the test mailing list