bind*EL* in fedora ?
John Ellson
ellson at research.att.com
Tue Aug 24 20:00:30 UTC 2004
Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>On Aug 24, 2004, Satish Balay <balay at fastmail.fm> wrote:
>
>
>
>>I guess the proper error (from today's rawhide) should have been
>>reported:
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>Running test transaction:
>>Errors reported doing trial run
>>file /usr/share/man/man5/resolver.5.gz conflicts between attempted installs of bind-utils-9.2.4-EL4_1 and man-pages-1.67-2
>>
>>
>
>It's actually a bug in up2date, that I filed earlier today. If you
>install the packages with rpm (I tried separately, but I suppose it
>would work to install them in a single transaction), no conflict is
>reported.
>
>
>
Not quite. I tried a single transaction, but that failed so I did an
"rpm -e" of the conflicting packages.
The dependency conflict is the same if I try to reinstall them individually:
root at ontap:RPMS# rpm -Uvh bind-chroot-9.2.4-EL4_1.i386.rpm
bind-devel-9.2.4-EL4_1.i386.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
bind = 9.2.4 is needed by bind-chroot-9.2.4-EL4_1
bind = 9.2.4 is needed by bind-devel-9.2.4-EL4_1
root at ontap:RPMS# rpm -q bind
bind-9.2.4-EL4_1
root at ontap:RPMS#
John
More information about the test
mailing list