Fedora Project launches Pre-Extras
Dag Wieers
dag at wieers.com
Sat Dec 18 22:15:25 UTC 2004
On Sat, 18 Dec 2004, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 08:57:23 -0500, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 11:58:45 +0100, nodata <fedora at nodata.co.uk> wrote:
> > > An rpm tool doesn't care about the filename, so why remove it?
> >
> > You have missed the point entirely. The filaname for an rpm is
> > typically constructed from a number of header tags as part of the
> > build process. The distrotags that are being used arent just in the
> > filename they are in the RELEASE tag.
>
> Which is part of the problem.
Please indicate where the problem is.
> > You can have this sort of
> > information in the filename without having it in the RELEASE tag.
>
> And then RPM database queries don't reproduce the filename. ;)
> Confusion again.
>
> $ sudo rpm -i foo-1.0-1.FC3.zork.i386.rpm
> $ rpm -q foo
> foo-1.0-1
>
> Dist tag and repo tag are gone. And with them the information
> about the origin of the package and its target platform.
Indeed, they should be in the release-tag for this (and many other)
reasons. As a compromise I once proposed to have them only in the
filename, because having it only in half of the cases is better than
having it in none at all.
-- dag wieers, dag at wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[all I want is a warm bed and a kind word and unlimited power]
More information about the test
mailing list