x864_64 up2date gone wild.

[Sam Varshavchik]

Gene C. writes:

> On Tuesday 17 February 2004 11:11, Justin M. Forbes wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 09:10:45PM -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>> > XFree86-libs-4.3.0-42 requires XFree86-libs-data-4.3.0-42
>> >
>> > I cannot figure out why it's stuck here.  Both XFree86-libs-4.3.0-55 and
>> > XFree86-libs-data-4.3.0-55 were selected for update.
>>
>> These two packages are the two i386 packages for XFree86.  Do you have an
>> i386 update channel with the proper versions of these packages? Though it
>> does seem odd that the i386 package dependencies resolve on a 64bit package
>> update... I suppose it is good behavior as far as keeping things in sync,
>> but technically unecessary...
> 
> The FC x86_64 distribution has both the x86_64 and the i386 versions for the 
> XFree86-libs and XFree86-libs-data packages.You need to make sure that 
> /etc/sysconfig/rhn/sources have both the x86_64 and i386 update repositoies 
> defined.

According to http://www.stl.gtri.gatech.edu/fedora/, I should only need:

    yum updates http://www.stl.gtri.gatech.edu/fedora/x86_64/updates/

Right now, this directory contains only XFree86-libs-4.3.0-55.x86_64.rpm, 
and does not have the i386 rpm.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/attachments/20040217/c18b6129/attachment.bin