New kernels and smbfs

Dave Jones davej at redhat.com
Wed Feb 25 17:29:57 UTC 2004


On Wed, 2004-02-25 at 17:17, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Do the latest *100+ kernels have smbfs built in once again?

no. I want to try and get folks to beat on cifs some more before
falling back to smbfs.  The upstream folks are very receptive to
feedback, so if you have a problem, mail its maintainer
Steven French <sfrench at us.ibm.com> and let him know what exactly
is failing.

If by the time we get to test3 things aren't looking too rosy,
I'll reenable smbfs in addition to cifs.

	Dave





More information about the test mailing list