Fedora Core 1 Testing Update: gcc-3.3.2-6
Mike Chambers
mike at netlyncs.com
Tue Jan 13 00:55:09 UTC 2004
On Mon, 2004-01-12 at 17:16, Sean Estabrooks wrote:
> Would still be interested to hear if you think a change is in order about
> when rpms are automatically inherited by FC2 development. Don't you think
> it would be better if it happened at testing time, rather than when moved
> to stable? Although i do like the notion that we test our rpms _before_
> we develop them... That's got to make development easier. ;o)
I don't think this test/stable and development/rawhide system is setup
that way. Testing is for making sure the package works before it is
moved to production up2date for the current release.
Development/rawhide is for working on the next release, which once a
package is working fine for the current one, then it's made to work with
the new-to-be release, which will probably have lots of different
dependencies/mechanisms, like the 2.6 kernel, newer kde, gnome and so
on.
LOL, doubt I'm explaining this correctly, hopefully my point is across
at least hehe.
--
Mike Chambers
Madisonville, KY
"It's funny until someone gets hurt...then it's hilarious!"
More information about the test
mailing list