file sharing

[Andy Green]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thursday 15 January 2004 21:11, stephan schutter wrote:

> This is just my point, though; why all this hacking to get this working?
> The experts in the community (or RedHat) could set it up right to start
> with. Customer / Client supplies data needed (NT domain name and
> credentials) then voila!

As I explained, I use samba across several machines and there was no 'hacking' 
required.  Our experiences have been different.  Maybe its because I try to 
stick to standards and reject proprietary lockins like AD.

> You know, the more you do FOR the user the more the user LIKES you. 

Actually, in my life I often found the more you do for people the more they 
consider your service a right that they take for granted.  But its also 
deeply true that when you help others you help yourself.

> And it is within the scope of Fedora to make a great desktop product 
eventually, right?

Sure, its already better than XP IMHO.  But you know it wasn't custom designed 
for your personal situation.

> I am relaying FEEDBACK to this list. From several people; current IT people
> (MS based as most are) and end users, and managers... Learning is
> expensive. 

If you want your comments to REALLY stick around and raise a response from a 
Redhat dev, register at bugzilla.redhat.com and bug your problems.

> I was hoping that Fedora as a project would appreciate feedback
> from non-Linux admins.

Personally I am just another user who tried to help you with your issues.  The 
solutions for the best part of your trouble lies with Samba, not Fedora, as I 
pointed out in my previous mail.

- -Andy

- -- 
Find your answer without waiting for replies....
Searchable list archives at 
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=fedora-list&r=1&w=2
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFABwhfjKeDCxMJCTIRAkYOAJ94XxjDwO9OzUIJ8Gid3pcRLzyLKACggTGx
sp26aWYkIpN1bXqtk1eqRfU=
=1rir
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----