tvtime vs xawtv
Jesse Keating
jkeating at j2solutions.net
Mon Mar 8 16:00:42 UTC 2004
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 08 March 2004 00:20, shrek-m at gmx.de wrote:
> am i the only one who is completely unsatisfied with tvtime ?
> with xawtv i am satisfied as i was it in the last years ( RHLx / FC1 )
> sure xawtv has some bugs, but ...
>
>
> xawtv: http://bytesex.org/xawtv/
> - better image quality ( with an digital-sat-receiver via
> scart-svideo-cabel )
> - 'export DISPLAY=remotehost:0; xawtv' works here without problems
> because i have several workstations it is a nice feature to export xawtv
> to the other workstations.
>
>
> tvtime:
> - really bad image quality in directly comparison with xawtv
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117651
> - 'export DISPLAY' or 'tvtime --display=remotehost:0' is not
> working
>
>
>
>
> unfortunately it looks like tvtime should replace xawtv in fc2
> in my eyes is it a step backwards and not forwards :-(
> tv-history afair in RHL7.x -> FCx :
> gtv -> xawtv -> tvtime
There seems to be very few folks that tvtime does not work well for. 2
that I've seen thus far. For the rest of us, tvtime is miles ahead of
xawtv. My tv quality is MUCH better w/ tvtime, and CPU usage is way down.
The OSD display and keybindings are awesome. IMHO tvtime should be
included in the distro proper, as it's a better choice for most people
(that I've been in contact with), and xawtv should live in Extras for
those of you that cannot use tvtime.
- --
Jesse Keating RHCE (http://geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team (http://www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key (http://geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
Was I helpful? Let others know:
http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFATJiq4v2HLvE71NURAlLUAKCLKO21hVrPHx+8BXQhONyHATQGtwCfeUk7
8k6KyNkFo3D6V1sp9egSWZs=
=i3mH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the test
mailing list