VMware with FC2T1

[Ben Steeves]

On Wed, 2004-03-10 at 10:15, Robert P. J. Day wrote:

> is this different with 2.6?  (sorry, i'm not at a system i can test this.)
> are you saying that if i have no 2.6 kernel source tree, then the file 
> version.h will exist under /lib/modules?  does that mean that build is no 
> longer a symlink?  what's going on under that directory?

As you say, build is no longer a symlink.  I have the kernel package
installed but *not* the kernel-source, and this is the layout of
directories under /lib/modules:

+ 2.6.3-2.1.246
|
+-- build
|   |
|   +-- arch   
|   +-- crypto   
|   +-- drivers 
|   +-- fs
|   +-- include   
|   +-- init
|   +-- ipc   
|   +-- kernel   
|   +-- lib 
|   +-- mm
|   +-- net
|   +-- scripts
|   +-- security
|   +-- sound
|   +-- usr
|   --- Makefile
+-- kernel
|   |
|   +-- arch
|   +-- crypto
|   +-- drivers
|   +-- fs
|   +-- lib
|   +-- net
|   +-- sound
+-- unsupported
    |
    +-- drivers
    +-- fs
    +-- net
-- 
Ben Steeves                     _                    bcs at metacon.ca
 The ASCII ribbon campaign     ( )               ben.steeves at unb.ca
   against HTML e-mail          X                GPG ID: 0xB3EBF1D9
http://www.metacon.ca/ascii    / \     Yahoo Messenger: ben_steeves