2.6.5-1.349 ignores selinux=0
Bill Nottingham
notting at redhat.com
Tue May 4 15:57:35 UTC 2004
James Morris (jmorris at redhat.com) said:
> On Tue, 4 May 2004, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>
> > On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 11:11:26AM -0400, James Morris wrote:
> > > On Tue, 4 May 2004, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> > >
> > > > Interesting - the CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_BOOTPARAM option is not set in
> > > > the kernel configuration in the corresponding kernel SRPM, so the
> > > > selinux=0 support is disabled.
> > >
> > > I don't know why this is disabled now. Arjan?
> >
> > isn't this obsoleted by the /etc/sysconfig/selinux thing in SysVinit ?
>
> Yes.
What we used selinux= and enforcing= was for overriding the config
file if you screw it up. If there's another way around this, sure.
Bill
More information about the test
mailing list