FC2T3 and sun Java

[Brian Anderson]

We may be talking an issue of scale here.  I'm talking about a full 
project recompile using ant over 7500 source files some, quite large.  I 
actually have observed failure many times when using antlr to make 
parsers, but I have no hard evidence for that.  What is consistent is 
that I can get the kernel to lock up for sure by doing two of these 
large compiles (over different source versions) simultaneously.

Igor N. Kolomiyets wrote:

> I am using both 1.4.2 and 1.5 Beta 1 on FC2T1-T3 and have no problem.
> It is running eclipse + JBoss and in eclipse i'm constantly making 
> changes to few dependent projects (few EJB modules and Web module) in 
> average about 50 sources. Also recently made few changes with 
> recompilation of the full project containing about 100 source files. 
> The described behavior was not ever observed.
>
> Best regards,
> Igor.
>
> Brian Anderson wrote:
>
>> I update frequently and I check it.  The latest kernel, 351, exhibits 
>> the same behavior.
>> Keith Irwin wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 2004-05-06 at 09:28, Brian Anderson wrote:
>>>  
>>>
>>>> There is a bug on this, 
>>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121902, but I 
>>>> was wondering if others have experienced the problems I have with 
>>>> the 1.4 VM on FC2.  My machine locks up hard when doing a compile 
>>>> of a large number of jave files.
>>>>   
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Yeah, I'm the one who posted that bug. I installed on a "demo" machine
>>> meant to host daily builds of a web application, running both jboss and
>>> weblogic.  I figured it wouldn't matter if there were some sound card
>>> related issues or other "desktop" bugs as long as I could at least use
>>> the machine to host some java web apps.
>>>
>>> No go!
>>>
>>> Back to FC1 on that box, and nothing else to test FC2 on.
>>>
>>> Alas, either getting java to work is not a priority for the fedora 
>>> guys,
>>> or its a symptom of some other problem (threading?) they *are* working
>>> on, but we can't see.
>>>
>>> It would be nice to know that they plan progress on this one, but I
>>> guess I'll just wait until the next test/beta.
>>>
>>> BTW, have they updated the kernel since test 3?  And if not, have you
>>> tried going back to an earlier kernel, as per one of the comments on 
>>> the
>>> issue you quoted?  Any success with that?
>>>
>>> Keith
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>>> -Brian
>>>>
>>>>   
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>
>>
>
>