Public SPEC files please
Dag Wieers
dag at wieers.com
Fri Nov 5 12:40:57 UTC 2004
On Fri, 5 Nov 2004, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Nov 2004 03:52:13 +0100 (CET), Dag Wieers wrote:
>
> > PS Some of it could even be "legally" required in the sense that eg.
> > fedora.us started its amavisd-new package from my SPEC file and I can't
> > even peek to see what exactly they have changed. Bugzilla has some broken
> > links, but there it ends. No SRPM, no SPEC file, no clue :)
>
> fedora.us spec files have been available separately for a very long
> time linked at the top of http://fedora.us
>
> http://www.fedora.us/tempspecs/
Well, those only contain the published RPMs SPEC files. My amavisd-new
example is a real example.
> Concerning "Fedora, Raw Hide, RHEL", progress bas been made with the CVS
> server, which exists already and undergoes non-public beta testing.
> Although I've not signed an NDA, it's up to Cristian Gafton to announce
> any details.
Ok.
-- dag wieers, dag at wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]
More information about the test
mailing list