problem with kernel-2.6.9-1.1_FC2 initrd - can't recreate, but disturbing

[Dave Jones]

On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 01:04:42AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
 > On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 12:34:44AM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
 > >  > Works fine on another test system too. *sigh* -- nothing worse than
 > >  > irreproducible results.
 > >  > What about <http://isec.pl/vulnerabilities/isec-0017-binfmt_elf.txt>?
 > > that's on my list for tomorrows fun. *sigh*.
 > 
 > :)
 > 
 > >  > Oh, and also, is that underscore in the package release just a temporary
 > >  > testing thing? I hope so, 'cause it's really ugly. :)
 > > Without it, theres no way to distinguish a 2.6.9-1.1 for FC2 from
 > > a 2.6.9-1.1 from FC3 development (extreme example used, but you get the
 > > idea).  I still occasionally see folks filing bugs against _ancient_
 > > kernels, so its feasible that it could come from either.
 > > The alternative would've been something like 2.6.9-1.1.1
 > 
 > I kinda prefer the alternative. Or something like
 > "kernel-2.6.9-1.2.FC2.src.rpm" like a lot of the other Fedora updates. I'm
 > afraid the underscore is going to break something somewhere.

Ah, I actually tried .FC2. Our new CVS infrastructure broke, so
this was easier, quicker, and didn't involve giving Cristian a headache 8)

		Dave