production usage of test releases. (was abandoning FC3-T2)
Rodolfo J. Paiz
rpaiz at simpaticus.com
Thu Oct 7 16:13:03 UTC 2004
On Thu, 2004-10-07 at 07:35 -0400, Jim Cornette wrote:
> If no one attempted testing in a production environment, bugs caused by
> high loads or corporate use would probably go undetected and propegate
> to the final release.
> On the bad side is possible data loss or corruption or downing a company
> from functioning. (True live ops would not be wise)
> I would not suggest production use of test releases, but simulated tests
> in production-like conditions seems fair practice to me.
However, allow me to quote from joelbryan's first post:
"Hey, I've installed five FC3T2 on our University server, that is used
by over 3000 PCs as a DHCP, SQUID, Firewall, Zebra Router, and a
Gateway.............. If this doesn't work, I'm srewed man..."
That sounds like "true live ops" to me, not "simulated tests in
production-like conditions" or "software R&D". Installing a test release
to show management what it looks like is great... putting 3,000 client
boxes behind it and depending on it for critical services is just
Rodolfo J. Paiz <rpaiz at simpaticus.com>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/attachments/20041007/fd77580d/attachment.bin
More information about the test