Firefox vs Ephipany?

[Kyrre Ness Sjobak]

Personally i prefer epiphany. Used to like opera (VERY maximalistic),
but somehow i tended to start epiphany more and more... Now i never ever
start opera anymore.

Simply beckause epiphany is faster, starts faster, and is tightly
integrated. I like integration - integration and consistency.

Kyrre, the guy who breaks gaim by a regular basis by dragging all sorts
of stuff into it. But, its quite stable now, almost always survives and
everything :)

man, 11.10.2004 kl. 19.45 skrev Doug Stewart:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> joelbryan wrote:
> | Both have tabbed browsing, both are lightweight, both have a lot of
> | common similarities.
> | Now that there's firefox and epiphany, I wonder what will people be
> | using in their desktops?
> |
> 
> Certainly not the sucktastic Epiphany.
> 
> Then again, I'm still bitter about Galeon being dropped as the browser
> of choice.
> 
> - --
> - ----------
> Doug Stewart
> Systems Administrator/Web Applications Developer
> Lockheed Martin Advanced Technology Labs
> dstewart at atl.lmco.com
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
> 
> iD8DBQFBasbWN50Q8DVvcvkRAk1RAJ9FQd27wY31hQaLuPR9W1pWqt1zUwCfct6R
> tjuvILTXS8G5xtes5hPNNMc=
> =GVdO
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----