Smaller /boot?

[Paul Iadonisi]

  Smooge has shed some possible light on the history of why, but I think
it would be wise to leave it as is.  At least with the DECPHQ (heh)
Alpha, the 64 bit binaries were *much* larger.  Given the recent need to
remove the source rpms from the DVD iso for x86_64, it looks like the
same may apply to that platform.  And when were all ready to upgrade to
256 bit platforms...

*ahem*

sorry.  Got a little carried away there.

-- 
-Paul Iadonisi
 Senior System Administrator
 Red Hat Certified Engineer / Local Linux Lobbyist
 Ever see a penguin fly?  --  Try Linux.
 GPL all the way: Sell services, don't lease secrets