issues with yum after up2date

[Michal Jaegermann]

On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 12:04:22AM -0700, Dougal wrote:
> thanks, it appears i have lost my ability to search existing bugs!!

It does not seem to be that simple, unfortunately.  For example
the following, generated by a search page, querry:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?query_format=&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&product=Fedora+Core&version=fc3test3&component_text=hal&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=VERIFIED&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&bug_status=RESOLVED&bug_status=CLOSED&bug_status=NEEDINFO&bug_status=MODIFIED&bug_status=ASSIGN_TO_PM&bug_status=INVESTIGATE&bug_status=SPEC&bug_status=ON_DEV&bug_status=QA_READY&bug_status=ON_QA&bug_status=PROD_READY&bug_status=FAILS_QA&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&status_whiteboard_type=allwordssubstr&status_whiteboard=&fixed_in_type=allwordssubstr&fixed_in=&qa_whiteboard_type=allwordssubstr&qa_whiteboard=&keywords_type=allwords&keywords=&emailassigned_to1=1&emailtype1=exact&email1=&emailassigned_to2=1&emailreporter2=1&emailqa_contact2=1&emailcc2=1&emailtype2=exact&email2=&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&changedin=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&cmdtype=doit&order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0=

comes at this moment with six bug reports and all of them CLOSED;
while I know for sure that other exist.  For example - not on
returned list

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=133777

I am not trying to pick on David here. :-)  It is just a specific
report which I can identify; I was searching for it the other day
and run into troubles.  I am sure that this is not the only example
as many times I got back DUPLICATE after I did a search before
a new filing.

   Michal