artswrapper suid?

[Arjan van de Ven]

On Mon, 2004-10-25 at 08:37 -0400, Neal D. Becker wrote:
> Why no suid for artswrapper?

well for setuid the question really should be.. "why" not "why not" :)
the fewer setuid in the distro the better.

why would sound stuff need to be setuid root ? the PAM console code will
make sound devices accessible to local users already.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/attachments/20041025/bd156491/attachment.bin