warning to list

[Harry Putnam]

Gregory G Carter <gcarter at aesgi.com> writes:

> They still crack Windows with perfectly signed packages from Microsoft.  
> I do not see signatures as such a big deal, therefore as they have not 
> really impacted code security of Microsoft products. 
>
> In FACT, I do not see how signing binaries helps really in dealing with 
> secure code for end users.
>
> I get perfectly crackable code, with authentic Microsoft PGP keys in 
> every service pak update for Windows 2000 for example...and XP.

You talk about crackable code.  This thread is about already cracked
code.

You need a new thread for your new discussion, this one is about
heading off the possibility of downloading already cracked code.  Not
whether that code is later crackable once installed.