Should Fedora rpms be signed?

[Matias Féliciano]

Le mardi 26 octobre 2004 à 13:17 +0200, nodata a écrit :
> Fedora Core test (rawhide) isn't signed.
> 
> Why?
> 

Or :
RHEL beta is signed.
Why ?

I decide to not use mirrors for rawhide.
/etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-devel.repo
        [development]
        name=Fedora Core $releasever - Development Tree
        baseurl=http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/$basearch/
        enabled=1

Not as good as signed rpm.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/attachments/20041026/4e3dc87b/attachment.bin