ntfs kernel module

Alexandre Oliva aoliva at redhat.com
Tue Oct 26 22:02:07 UTC 2004

On Oct 26, 2004, Dan Hollis <goemon at anime.net> wrote:

> The excuses for not including ntfs have varied over the years, always 
> changing. The decision not to include ntfs-readonly is an ideological 
> issue and not a technical or legal one.

If you're so sure there isn't a legal issue, I'm sure you wouldn't
mind signing an agreement with Red Hat, becoming personally
responsible for any liability resulting from shipping a kernel with
the NTFS module enabled, right?

Alexandre Oliva             http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer   aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist  oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}

More information about the test mailing list