rawhide report: 20050417 changes

[Klaasjan Brand]

On Sun, 2005-04-17 at 23:15 +0200, nodata wrote:

> Perhaps, but the justification for disabling it seems to be:
> 1. Laptops
> 2. Err.. that's it.
> and disabling such a common useful tool with next to no justification
> seems, well, bizarre.

3. Older systems and/or systems with slower disk get totally
unresponsive for a few minutes.

4. With all the file-alteration monitor goodness available in modern
Linux kernels isn't it about time someone thinks of a better way to
maintain an index instead of reading the entire fs?

Klaasjan