no longer maintained rhl/fc bugs
Jesse Keating
jkeating at j2solutions.net
Thu Apr 21 21:20:31 UTC 2005
On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 23:12 +0200, shrek-m at gmx.de wrote:
> and for older bugreports ?
>
> product=red+hat+linux status=needinfo
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?product=Red+Hat
> +Linux&version=4.2&version=5.0&version=5.1&version=5.2&version=6.0&version=6.1&version=6.2&version=6.2EE&version=6.2J&version=7.0&version=7.0J&version=7.0tc&version=7.1&version=7.1k&version=7.2&version=7.3&version=8.0&version=9&version=GinGin64&bug_status=NEEDINFO&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc=
>
> sort by ID
>
> eg.
>
> first:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18315
> status=needinfo
> version=rhl7.0
> last comment on 2000-10-05 03:29 EST
>
>
> last:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122993
> status=needinfo
> version=rhl9
> last comment on 2004-05-11 05:00 EST
Good point. For anything that isn't RHL 7.3, RHL 9, or FC1+ thats the
decision of other people.
>From my perspective, if it looks like a security issue, ping a Fedora
Legacy fellow to check and see if it's fixed in a newer release. If
not, file under legacy. If it's !security, close away.
--
Jesse Keating RHCE (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team (www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
Was I helpful? Let others know:
http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating
More information about the test
mailing list