no longer maintained rhl/fc bugs

Jesse Keating jkeating at j2solutions.net
Thu Apr 21 21:20:31 UTC 2005


On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 23:12 +0200, shrek-m at gmx.de wrote:
> and for older bugreports ?
> 
> product=red+hat+linux  status=needinfo
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?product=Red+Hat
> +Linux&version=4.2&version=5.0&version=5.1&version=5.2&version=6.0&version=6.1&version=6.2&version=6.2EE&version=6.2J&version=7.0&version=7.0J&version=7.0tc&version=7.1&version=7.1k&version=7.2&version=7.3&version=8.0&version=9&version=GinGin64&bug_status=NEEDINFO&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc=
> 
> sort by ID
> 
> eg.
> 
> first:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18315
> status=needinfo
> version=rhl7.0
> last comment on 2000-10-05 03:29 EST
> 
> 
> last:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122993
> status=needinfo
> version=rhl9
> last comment on 2004-05-11 05:00 EST

Good point.  For anything that isn't RHL 7.3, RHL 9, or FC1+ thats the
decision of other people.

>From my perspective, if it looks like a security issue, ping a Fedora
Legacy fellow to check and see if it's fixed in a newer release.  If
not, file under legacy.  If it's !security, close away.

-- 
Jesse Keating RHCE      (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team      (www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key          (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
 
Was I helpful?  Let others know:
 http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating




More information about the test mailing list