GFS modules not loading

Justin Conover justin.conover at gmail.com
Tue Feb 8 19:53:32 UTC 2005


Thanks,  I'll check it out tonight.


On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 20:42:13 +0100, Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm at atrpms.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 12:55:42PM -0600, Justin Conover wrote:
> > On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 12:31:02 +0100, Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm at atrpms.net> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 12:32:36PM -0600, Justin Conover wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 13:12:28 -0500, Jeff Spaleta <jspaleta at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 11:48:59 -0600, Justin Conover
> > > > > <justin.conover at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > I wanted to install GFS to learn/play with it and I'm not able to load
> > > > > > the gfs module so I'm wondering what "I'm" missing:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > # yum --enablerepo=development -y install *\GFS\*2
> > > > >
> > > > > which kernel are you running?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2.6.10-1.760_FC3
> > >
> > > In that case please try
> > >
> > >    http://atrpms.net/dist/fc3/cluster/
> > >
> >
> > I will check that out when I get home Axel.
> >
> > Question though, are there other deps that your kernel will force me
> > to use from your packages?  I know some of you packages, (i think
> > audio) will make me use system packages that I don't want updated,
> 
> You mean the updated alsa drivers? No, they should also be standalone
> packages, requiring only the matching kernel to be installed.
> 
> Perhaps you ran into the issue, where asink for a project with kernel
> modules would pull in yet another kernel instead of using the one you
> are running. You can work around this by issuing
> 
> yum install foo-kmdl-`uname -r` foo
> 
> to ensure yum/apt/up2date/smart really pick the kernel modules for the
> kernel you want.
> 
> Wrt to GFS/cluster: There are interdependencies between some of the
> cluster packages in the folder above. Other than the kmdl packages you
> should install them all, and also all kmdl packages matching the
> kernel you are running.
> 
> > so I haven't been using them (plus I don't really need them).  So I
> > just wanted to know if your kernel packages will create the same
> > case.  I wouldn't see why a kernel package would require x, y and z
> > but you never know :D
> 
> If there are dependencies for x, y, z that are not needed, then that's
> a bug that should be reported (bugzilla.atrpms.net, lists.atrpms.net
> or PM ;)
> --
> Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
> 
> 
> --
> fedora-test-list mailing list
> fedora-test-list at redhat.com
> To unsubscribe:
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
> 
> 
>




More information about the test mailing list