Any danger from these ports?
Luciano Miguel Ferreira Rocha
strange at nsk.no-ip.org
Mon Jan 10 17:19:16 UTC 2005
On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 12:07:50PM -0500, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 16:59:46 +0000, Luciano Miguel Ferreira Rocha
> > The feature is nice, and I have no problem with it if a visible option
> > to turn it off is visible during installation, mentioning it's
> > unsuitable for server operation.
>
> 'unsuitable' i think is a matter of opinion.
Of course.
> How about we just
> explain what that set of rules does in a couple of sentences and let
> the server admin determine if its unsuitable or not.
> Some server admins would probably find it perfectly fine if the
> default timescales invovled in the temporary lock out were suitable.
Some server admins don't know how some protocols and application work.
And I wouldn't want to see FC4 being rated as slow or disfuncional for
network services by less knowledgeable admins,
Regards,
Luciano Rocha
--
Consciousness: that annoying time between naps.
More information about the test
mailing list