Optional Dependent RPMs
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
ivazquez at ivazquez.net
Tue Jul 19 21:31:00 UTC 2005
On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 17:14 -0400, Steve Friedman wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Jul 2005, Christopher Aillon wrote:
>
> > Robert Nichols wrote:
> >> I find that with firefox-1.0.6-0.1 the Flashblock 1.2.9 extension no
> >> longer recognizes the whitelisted web sites that should be allowed to
> >> load Flash content. The sites are still listed in the Options dialog,
> >> but their Flash content is being blocked.
> >
> > I was able to reproduce this issue using Flashblock 1.2.9. However, please
> > note that 1.3.2 is the latest version of Flashblock, and works fine with the
> > 1.0.6 RPMs as far as I can tell with my testing. I would advise updating to
> > Flashblock 1.3.2.
> >
> > Thanks for your feedback with the RPM! It's very much appreciated.
> >
>
> This is a major gripe that I have with RPM. There is no way for the
> firefox RPM to specify that the Flashblock RPM needs to be upgraded IFF
> flashblock is installed.
Conflicts: Flashblock < 1.3.2
--
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazquez at ivazquez.net>
http://fedora.ivazquez.net/
gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 38028b72
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/attachments/20050719/1eefa27f/attachment.bin
More information about the test
mailing list