FC4t1 and abiword
fedora at wir-sind-cool.org
Sat Mar 19 18:36:39 UTC 2005
On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 10:47:42 -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> > Most of the packages in Fedora Extras Development are just copies of their
> > FC3 counterparts. This is how the tree was filled with packages, creating
> > such pitfalls as the broken python dependencies you've noticed. It's a
> > pitty the tree was not filled with a mass-rebuild.
> Okay michael, i'm sorry you feel "it's a pity". I asked on maintainers
> as to which path to take, I received a number of answers via irc and
> other locations and the general answer was "merge fc3's extras in, fix
> the ones that break".
> I'll rebuild anything that comes up and I'm working all the time on the
> build system, what else can I do to keep you from lamenting extras in
> the way you do?
You can't do anything else, because I disagree with the current procedure,
and that's it.
More information about the test