Eclipse - failed dependencies - after 10 Feb Update

Doug Fordham dfordham at gmail.com
Sat Feb 11 15:20:44 UTC 2006


No solutions at the moment...ran a minor update this morning:
Updated: gnupg2.i386 0:1.9.20-1.fc5.1 gpgme.i386 0:1.1.0-3.fc5.1 
libksba.i386 0:0.9.13-2.fc5.1 pinentry.i386 0:0.7.2-1.fc5.1 yumex.noarch 
0:0.99.5-1.0.fc5
Complete!

....but still needed to exclude the Eclipse entries:
yum --exclude=eclipse-platform --exclude=eclipse-platform-devel.i386  
--exclude=eclipse-rcp --exclude=eclipse-jdt --exclude=eclipse-ecj 
--exclude=eclipse-bugzilla --exclude=1:3.1.2-1jpp_5fc 
--exclude=libswt3-gtk2 update


MW Mike Weiner (5028) wrote:
> From: fedora-test-list-bounces at redhat.com
> [mailto:fedora-test-list-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Doug Fordham
> ...running a "yum update" produces the following:
> Resolving Dependencies
> --> Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait.
> ---> Package eclipse-bugzilla.i386 1:0.1.1_fc-6.2 set to be updated 
> ---> Package eclipse-jdt.i386 1:3.1.2-1jpp_5fc set to be updated Package
>
> ---> eclipse-rcp.i386 1:3.1.2-1jpp_5fc set to be updated Package 
> ---> eclipse-ecj.i386 1:3.1.2-1jpp_5fc set to be updated Package 
> ---> eclipse-platform.i386 1:3.1.2-1jpp_5fc set to be updated
> --> Running transaction check
> --> Processing Dependency: eclipse-platform = 3.1.2 for package: 
> eclipse-bugzilla
> --> Processing Dependency: java-javadoc for package: eclipse-platform 
> --> Processing Dependency: libswt3-gtk2 = 1:3.1.2-1jpp_5fc for package:
> eclipse-platform
> --> Finished Dependency Resolution
> Error: Missing Dependency: eclipse-platform = 3.1.2 is needed by package
> eclipse-bugzilla
> Error: Missing Dependency: java-javadoc is needed by package
> eclipse-platform
> Error: Missing Dependency: libswt3-gtk2 = 1:3.1.2-1jpp_5fc is needed by
> package eclipse-platform
>
> ...no amount of fiddling with exclude statements in yum yields result. 
> Anyone else seeing this behavior?
> --
> Yes I was seeing this myself yesterday actually and you're right, I
> couldn't figure out a proper exclude that would allow the yum update to
> occur and not break everything. Any solutions? 
>
> Michael Weiner
>
>   




More information about the test mailing list