Why is xscreensaver removed in favor of gnome-screensaver

Dave Atkins thedave at ix.netcom.com
Fri Feb 24 08:14:59 UTC 2006


On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 17:53 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> James Jones wrote:
> 
> >Jonathan Berry wrote:
. . . 
> >Yes, but... wasn't that only added after users raised a major ruckus
> >about the imposition of spatial mode?
> >
> It was previously configurable as GConf key.
> 
> -- 
> Rahul 

The Gnome bog-standard answer "Configurable as a GConf key" translates
to "not user configurable" for most end users.

Whereas, a tick-box in the Nautilus preferences control panel could do
the same thing with minimal pain.

It seems silly to put all the code in to modify the window behavior, and
look-and-feel, and not go the extra 10% to write a means to configure
it.

D.




More information about the test mailing list