"install everything" and @everything dumped

Axel Thimm Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Fri Feb 24 18:24:00 UTC 2006


On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 06:51:53PM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-02-24 at 00:19 +0100, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > I was about to submit a bug report that neither does the installer
> > simply allow my to throw the full contents of the DVD onto my disk
> > anymore, nor do any of my kickstart files work with FC5 anymore, when
> > I found that this was not a bug or a temporary shortcoming, but was
> > done on purpose (at least according to a post by R. Sundaram which
> > sounded quite authoritative).
> 
> 
> you assume it's even possible to (sanely) install all packages, which I
> think already was not the case for a while, with an increasing number of
> special cases to keep the "almost everything" install working....
> 
> (kernels and other rpms with conflicting files etc etc)

Yes, I know, that was always the case. And "everything" meant just that.

An everything install option should had been even a must for the test
releases. There are bugs that emerge only in bad synergies of
packages.

I just installed FC5t3, clicked on any funny checkbox there was and I
get a system w/o emacs ...

BTW I found a bugzilla entry [2] which contrary to R. Sundaram's
report [1] stated that this was just due to missing yum glue and not a
permanent state:

[1] http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showpost.php?p=438011&postcount=4
[2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177621

Let's hope a coming rawhide cut will have this restored in one way or
another.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/attachments/20060224/f5ec6261/attachment.bin 


More information about the test mailing list